Maximum likelihood multiple imputation

I just came across a very interesting draft paper on arXiv by Paul von Hippel on 'maximum likelihood multiple imputation'. von Hippel has made many important contributions to the multiple imputation (MI) literature, including the paper which advocated that one 'transform then impute' when one has interaction or non-linear terms in the substantive model of interest. The present paper on maximum likelihood multiple imputation is in its seventh draft on arXiv, the first being released back in 2012. I haven't read every detail of the paper, but it looks to me to be another thought provoking and potentially practice changing paper. This post will not attempt by any means to cover all of the important points made in the paper, but will just highlight a few.

Read moreMaximum likelihood multiple imputation

Randomisation as the basis for inference in trials

Today I was lucky enough to listen Prof William Rosenberger present the 15th Armitage lecture in Cambridge. Prof Rosenberger has worked extensively on randomisation in trials in various respects (see his book), and he delivered a really interesting talk. The talk can now be viewed online here.

Read moreRandomisation as the basis for inference in trials

Live stream seminar 26th October 2017: Covariate adjustment and prediction of mean response in randomised trials

Next Thursday (14:00 UK time, 26th October 2017) I'll be giving a seminar at the University of Southampton in the UK on my recent work on covariate adjustment and prediction of mean response in randomised trials. The seminar will be live streamed here, which after the talk will be accessible as a recording.

The talk abstract can be found here.

Testing equality of two survival distributions: log-rank/Cox versus RMST

Cox's proportional hazards model is by far the most common approach used to model survival or time to event data. For a simple two group comparison, such as in a randomised controlled trial, the model says that the hazard of failure in one group is a constant ratio (over time) of the hazard of failure in the other group. A test that this hazard ratio equals 1 is a test of the null hypothesis of equality of the survival functions of the two groups. The log rank test is essentially equivalent to the score test that the HR=1 in the Cox model, and is commonly used as the primary analysis hypothesis test in randomised trials.

Read moreTesting equality of two survival distributions: log-rank/Cox versus RMST

Covariate adjustment and prediction of mean response in randomised trials

Last week I attended the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics' conference in Vigo, Spain. I spoke about work I've been doing recently on covariate adjusted mean estimation in randomised trials. A pre-print draft of the work is available at arXiv.

Read moreCovariate adjustment and prediction of mean response in randomised trials

Imputing missing covariates in nested case-control and case cohort studies

I'm pleased to announce a new version (1.3.0) of the smcfcs package for multiple imputation of missing covariates. Thanks to Ruth Keogh at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, this new version features two additional functions, smcfcs.casecohort and smcfcs.nestedcc. These allow for imputing of missing covariates in case cohort and nested case-control studies respectively. A paper describing the methodology is forthcoming.

The package is now on CRAN and so can be installed/updated in the usual way from R or RStudio.

There are of course various papers on the case cohort and nested case control study designs. For further reading, I'd recommend looking at Ruth's book, co-authored with David Cox, 'Case-Control Studies', which contains a chapter on each design.